# Defending Human Autonomy in an Age of Automation
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding the Automation Dilemma
In the aviation industry, pilots often encounter challenges when landing in low-visibility conditions. To assist them, automated landing systems were developed. However, despite their reliability, many pilots hesitate to utilize these systems, feeling a loss of control over the aircraft.
Similarly, as everyday employees, we may experience this same sense of unease with the ever-increasing implementation of automation technologies. While these innovations promise enhanced safety and efficiency, it’s natural to question their necessity and the implications they have on our roles. Why should technological algorithms dictate company decisions over the insights of experienced workers? The need to maintain a sense of control over new technologies is paramount, and here’s why.
Section 1.1: The Conflict Between AI and Human Expertise
Automation advocates often emphasize the benefits of their solutions. This is particularly evident in discussions surrounding self-driving vehicles. Paul Newman, a co-founder of a self-driving company, asserts that these vehicles, being less prone to human errors, can significantly enhance road safety. He believes that the integration of advanced sensors and data analytics will soon enable autonomous cars to outperform human drivers.
However, what about the skilled truck drivers who have honed their abilities on the road? They may soon find themselves replaced by more reliable autonomous vehicles. Proponents of automation argue that AI can enhance safety by taking over decision-making processes, yet they frequently overlook the vital societal discussions surrounding these advancements.
Automation designers often prioritize efficiency and cost without considering the perspectives of professionals in the field. Why should these designers hold the authority to dictate outcomes over those actively engaged in their work?
Subsection 1.1.1: The Role of Human Responsibility
In sectors like healthcare, innovation is crucial, with data-driven solutions promising transformative treatments. Mental health apps, for instance, aim to provide accessible support to users. However, there are concerns regarding the biases these technologies may carry, particularly since they often serve vulnerable populations.
These automation solutions must be held accountable, and the responsibility for providing effective mental health support should rest with qualified professionals. In the American healthcare system, for example, state boards regulate which technologies can be adopted, ensuring that qualified practitioners maintain control over patient care.
In contrast, the educational field often lacks similar safeguards. Teachers may find their expertise overshadowed by administrative decisions regarding technology use in classrooms. To empower educators, it’s essential to establish regulatory boards that assess the implications of educational technologies.