Chapter 1: The Fundamental Divide

The sharp contrast between William Blake (1757–1827) and Isaac Newton (1642–1727) serves as a compelling illustration of differing approaches to fundamental questions. Blake embodies the essence of poetry, while Newton represents the realm of science. By examining their works and Blake’s responses to Newton’s theories, we uncover significant insights into the divergent methodologies of science and poetry.

A productive way to analyze Blake and Newton is through their interpretations of the Bible, which served as a shared foundation during their time. In the early 19th century, Christianity offered a widely accepted narrative in the areas where both thinkers lived. Both Blake and Newton had profound beliefs in the Bible as the 'word of God,' yet their interpretations and engagements with it were markedly different.

Newton's "Observations Upon the Prophecies of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John" (1733) primarily focuses on the apocalyptic predictions found in the Book of Daniel and the Book of Revelation. This work not only sheds light on specific prophecies but also reveals Newton’s broader understanding of the Scriptures. His analytical approach is evident in how he explains the meaning of various biblical symbols. For instance, he interprets the imagery of land and water as metaphors for different regions and nations, suggesting that events such as wars and persecutions can be understood through these symbols:

In the earth, the dry land and congregated waters, as a sea, a river, a flood, are put for the people of several regions, nations, and dominions; embittering of waters, for great affliction of the people by war and persecution; turning things into blood, for the mystical death of bodies politic, that is, for their dissolution; the overflowing of a sea or river, for the invasion of the earth politic, by the people of the waters; drying up of waters, for the conquest of their regions by the earth…houses and ships, for families, assemblies, and towns, in the earth and sea politic; and a navy of ships of war, for an army of that kingdom which is signified by the sea.

Conversely, Blake's interaction with the Bible inspired him to create his own prophetic works. Through his longer poems, he developed a rich mythology that sought to encapsulate spiritual truths, which he believed was the essence of prophecy. Today, many perceive prophecy as merely predicting the future, yet Blake's interpretation emphasizes its role in unveiling spiritual concepts rather than forecasting events. Thus, engaging with Blake's poetry often parallels the experience of reading the major prophetic texts of the Bible, which are predominantly poetic in nature. Rather than elucidating spiritual mysteries through explanation, Blake was compelled to compose verses that reflect and illuminate these mysteries.

Given the significance of biblical interpretation for both Newton and Blake, it’s easy to understand why Blake harbored such strong feelings against Newton (as well as Locke, though that topic will be explored later).

Section 1.1: Science vs. Poetry

The contrasting impulses of science and poetry reveal their fundamental opposition: science leans towards analysis and definitive answers, while poetry embraces uncertainty and exploration. From Blake’s vantage point, Newton’s analytical methods were not merely a differing viewpoint but rather a form of error and heresy. Conversely, from a modern scientific perspective, Blake's work appears to transcend scripture, creating a new narrative rather than simply illuminating existing truths, thus branding him a heretic.

Subsection 1.1.1: Visual Representation

Chapter 2: Understanding Through Different Lenses

To better illustrate the diverse approaches of these two influential figures, we can examine relevant video content that delves into their differing philosophies.

A discussion on the oral arguments made by Meade, Blake, and Brennan highlighting their contrasting perspectives.

Jason Whittaker explores the life and work of William Blake, shedding light on his creative process and philosophical inclinations.