Does the iPhone Render Traditional Cameras Obsolete?
Written on
The Shift in Photography: iPhone vs. Traditional Cameras
For many, including myself, it has become increasingly clear that the iPhone may have rendered traditional cameras less relevant...
I recently parted ways with my last camera, a Fujifilm X70, and surprisingly, I felt no remorse. In retrospect, I wonder why I held on to it for so long. Since acquiring the iPhone XS, I hardly used it, and the differences in image quality became nearly indistinguishable. While the Fujifilm was undeniably a superb camera for its size and price, it was time to let go, and I attribute this to Apple.
When I bought my first iPhone, the 6S, on launch day, just before a trip back to Romania, I was motivated by common frustrations. My previous Android devices frequently malfunctioned, software updates were scarce after a year, and their resale value plummeted shortly after purchase. Owning an Android felt like a poor decision both technologically and financially. I hoped the iPhone 6S would change that. However, I was still skeptical about its photography capabilities and felt the need to test them.
For every vacation, I used to pack a camera. Over the years, I owned various types: compact point-and-shoots, hybrids, DSLRs, and more. They all shared a common inconvenience—they added extra bulk to my travel gear.
The Challenge of Carrying Extra Gear
Many photographers often assert, “The best camera is the one you have with you.” This is more than just a saying; it’s a reality for most, including me. If I had a dollar for every time I or someone else remarked that a camera is just another item to carry, I wouldn’t be wealthy, but I’d certainly have some extra cash.
The truth is that most people prefer not to carry unnecessary items, especially if they serve a singular purpose. Dedicated cameras, unfortunately, fit that description. Their sole function is to capture images, and often, they require adjustments like setting the correct scene or exposure before you can shoot.
To make matters worse, you’re often carrying more than just “one extra thing.” I’ve noticed that camera batteries now tend to deplete faster than they did in the past, especially compared to smartphones. This often means an extra battery is necessary. If your camera has interchangeable lenses, you’ll end up toting along additional lenses as well, inevitably leading to the use of a bulky camera bag. This becomes a genuine inconvenience. I had a Canon EOS 600D, a wonderful DSLR, but carrying it along with an extra battery and multiple lenses quickly turned into more of a burden than a joy.
Understanding My Photography Aspirations
I need to clarify something crucial: while I'm not a professional photographer, I have a passion for photography. This realization changed my approach. I no longer felt compelled to meet a certain standard of camera gear to validate my photos. So, during my travels across Romania, I exclusively used my iPhone 6S. Looking back at those images, I’m amazed at how stunning they turned out, especially considering I was using just a phone—not a dedicated camera.
Suddenly, my creativity flourished, unrestricted by the limitations of extra equipment.
The Advent of Computational Photography
Even after my successful experience with the iPhone 6S, I still purchased two more cameras—both the Fujifilm X70 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10. My goal was to find pocket-sized options similar to my iPhone. While they somewhat achieved portability, my enthusiasm waned quickly, shifting back to the iPhone XS.
The iPhone X was already remarkable, but waiting for the S version proved wise, and once it was available, I eagerly bought one. After taking just a few shots, I was sold; a photographer friend remarked, “Computational photography has revolutionized the photography industry.”
At this juncture, many point-and-shoot cameras seem redundant.
Now, it’s essential to clarify that while Apple didn't invent computational photography, they certainly popularized it, making it a standard by 2022. Competitors like Samsung and Google are also advancing in this realm, but Apple has maintained a leadership position, even extending these innovations to video.
Computational photography can seem almost magical, but from a technical standpoint, it makes perfect sense. With processors capable of analyzing images, they can overcome the limitations of lens physics and emulate reality. This technology allows anyone to capture excellent photos without needing multiple attempts—something professional photographers routinely do.
One could argue that this approach may not be entirely true to life, but as someone who has owned various cameras, I can attest that there’s no such thing as a universally accurate depiction in photography. Variations in sensors, software interpretations, and lens characteristics all contribute to differing outcomes.
In many ways, computational photography renders a significant portion of traditional cameras more or less obsolete.
While my iPhone 13 Pro may not compete with a $20,000 camera, it certainly suffices for capturing unforgettable images. For most of us, that’s all we desire—beautiful photos without the need for dedicated gear.
Exploring the Impact of Computational Photography
The first video titled "iPhone vs. DSLR 2023: Is Your Big Camera Obsolete?" discusses how advancements in smartphone photography challenge traditional cameras.
The second video titled "Are Cameras Still Better Than iPhones?" explores the ongoing debate over the superiority of dedicated cameras versus smartphones for photography.