How Ignorant Politicians Manage to Stay in Power During Elections
Written on
Chapter 1: The Political Landscape
Recently, J.D. Vance has been suggested as a potential vice president, which raises concerns about his influence over policies affecting our global population of eight billion. While it's easy to critique specific politicians, it’s evident that many voters appear untroubled by a significant lack of awareness regarding basic scientific principles.
Take climate change, for example. While the Earth has experienced climate variations for billions of years, Vance has been quoted stating that these changes have occurred "for millennia." This analogy is akin to claiming one has been digesting a meal for mere seconds instead of acknowledging the days or hours it typically takes. Such statements reveal a profound misunderstanding of not only climate science but also geologic time and the ongoing processes shaping our planet.
Vance, like many uninformed politicians, seems to prioritize appealing to those who prefer to absolve themselves of responsibility for the current state of the planet. The distinction between Human Emissions Climate Change and natural climate cycles is crucial, especially considering the significant impact eight billion people have on our environment. The combustion of fossil fuels leads to increased temperatures, rendering our world less hospitable, especially for species that rely on ecological balance.
Vance is merely the latest in a series of politicians who either mislead intentionally or lack basic knowledge. Research from Pew indicates that many political views align with extreme agendas rather than relying on factual evidence.
Section 1.1: Misguided Perspectives on Reproductive Rights
Another striking example of Vance's rhetoric comes from his comments on abortion. He frames the debate not as a matter of women's rights but rather as a question of whether an unborn baby should be allowed to live—raising the notion of murder in this context.
No rational individual endorses the notion of killing babies. However, Vance's comments highlight a fundamental misunderstanding, equating an abortion with the moral implications of a medical procedure such as an appendectomy. It’s worth considering how animals perceive medical interventions; they do not impose human moral judgments on such matters.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Disposable Future
In the same vein, Vance expresses concerns about the idea of making unborn babies disposable, a comment that inadvertently sheds light on how society often treats individuals post-birth—subjecting them to poverty, industrial exploitation, and war.
Interestingly, Vance avoids addressing the fossil fuel wealth that has enriched him or the human toll of extraction industries, which claim countless lives daily. This silence represents a “Lie of Omission,” as he and other politicians prefer to present appealing narratives to gain electoral support rather than confronting uncomfortable truths.
Section 1.2: The Cost of Ignorance
The tendency of politicians like Vance to promote denial about pressing issues—climate change, economic challenges, and public health crises—may make them more palatable to voters. However, true leadership requires more than just popular appeal; it demands a commitment to confronting reality.
Chapter 2: The Path Forward
To foster genuine cooperation and progress, we need to adopt a mindset rooted in action rather than mere agreement. This involves extreme courage, a commitment to inclusivity, and an unwavering dedication to truth.
Extreme action diverges significantly from extreme ideology. It calls for innovative collaboration and a willingness to engage with reality, rather than retreating into comforting narratives.
Please follow, clap, highlight, or comment for Rivers of Appreciation.
An Injustice!
A new intersectional publication, geared towards voices, values, and identities!
aninjusticemag.com