Model Compression: Understanding Teacher-Student Knowledge Distillation
Written on
Chapter 1: Introduction to Model Compression
It is a common misconception that larger models always yield better results. Take GPT-3, for example, which is trained on a vast dataset of 570 GB and has 175 billion parameters. While training expansive models can enhance performance metrics, deploying these hefty models—particularly on edge devices—presents significant challenges.
Often, very large deep learning models achieve impressive accuracy on validation datasets but can struggle with latency, memory constraints, and overall efficiency during inference. Knowledge distillation emerges as a valuable technique to address these issues. It allows for the ‘distillation’ of knowledge from a complex model into a smaller, more deployable model, all while preserving accuracy metrics.
If you’re keen on a practical application of this technique, take a look at the video below!
Chapter 2: Defining Knowledge Distillation
Knowledge distillation is a compression method that enables the training of a smaller model by transferring insights from a larger, more intricate one. In this context, the smaller model is referred to as the "student," while the larger model is the "teacher." The student aims to replicate the teacher's performance by leveraging its knowledge, thus achieving comparable accuracy.
This system consists of three key components: the knowledge itself, the distillation algorithm, and the model architecture.
Section 2.1: Sources of Knowledge
While knowledge generally consists of weights and biases, its sources can vary. We can categorize them into three main types: response-based knowledge, feature-based knowledge, and relation-based knowledge.
Subsection 2.1.1: Response-based Knowledge
As the name implies, this type of knowledge centers on the outputs from the final layer of the teacher model, enabling the student to imitate its predictions. This is accomplished through a distillation loss that measures the discrepancy between the logits of both models. As this loss is minimized during training, the student becomes increasingly adept at replicating the teacher's predictions.
Subsection 2.1.2: Feature-based Knowledge
Feature-based knowledge extracts information from the intermediate and output layers of the teacher model. The intermediate layers contain feature activations, which the student model directly emulates. Here, the distillation loss minimizes the differences between the feature activations of both models.
Subsection 2.1.3: Relation-based Knowledge
This type of knowledge focuses on the relationships among feature maps, which can be expressed through correlations, graphs, similarity matrices, and feature embeddings.
Section 2.2: Training Approaches
Training methods can vary based on how the teacher model is utilized. There are three primary approaches: offline distillation, online distillation, and self-distillation.
Subsection 2.2.1: Offline Distillation
This is the most common approach where a pre-trained model serves as the teacher, with its knowledge distilled into the student model. Given the abundance of large pre-trained models available, this method is widely adopted.
Subsection 2.2.2: Online Distillation
This method is particularly beneficial when a pre-trained model is not available. Both the teacher and student models are updated concurrently within a single training framework, which can be highly efficient when employing parallel computing.
Subsection 2.2.3: Self-distillation
This less conventional method uses the same model for both the teacher and the student, which can be executed in various ways—such as utilizing knowledge from deeper layers to enhance shallower ones.
Chapter 3: Architecture Considerations
Designing an effective student-teacher architecture is crucial for successful distillation. Typically, there is a significant disparity in width and depth between the complex teacher and the simpler student model. Common architectures for knowledge transfer include:
- A streamlined version of the teacher model with reduced layers and neurons.
- A quantized version of the teacher model.
- A minimized version of the teacher model with an optimized architecture.
Section 3.1: Case Study – DistilBERT
A prominent example of model compression is found in various BERT models that utilize knowledge distillation to create lightweight variants. For instance, DistilBERT, developed by Hugging Face, is a smaller, faster, and more efficient version of BERT. During the pre-training phase, knowledge distillation was employed, resulting in a model that is 40% smaller (66 million parameters compared to 110 million) and 60% faster, while retaining approximately 97% of the original BERT model's accuracy.
Chapter 4: Conclusion
Model compression techniques—including knowledge distillation and model pruning—are essential for addressing one of the main challenges in deploying deep learning solutions: managing memory, latency, and capacity constraints. For a more practical illustration of these concepts, check out the video below!
If you found this information valuable, consider following me on Medium. You can also subscribe to the Artificialis newsletter for more insights.