# The Transformation of Twitter's Blue Checkmark: From Prestige to Scorn
Written on
The Rise and Fall of the Blue Checkmark
In the early days of Twitter, the blue checkmark symbol next to a user’s name served as a hallmark of credibility and recognition, signifying that the account was verified. However, recent events have drastically altered the perception of this once-coveted symbol. What was once a badge of honor is now seen as a mark of contempt, associated with individuals viewed as disconnected elites or dubious figures.
How did public sentiment shift so drastically, leaving this emblem of status in ruins? And what implications does this transformation hold for Twitter's future and the broader realm of social media? I was eager to explore this phenomenon.
The Origins of the Blue Checkmark
Twitter first introduced the blue checkmark in 2009 to combat impersonation and identity fraud on its platform. Initially, only high-profile figures such as celebrities, politicians, and journalists had verified accounts, which symbolized authenticity.
Twitter emphasized that this verification was not an endorsement of popularity but a means to confirm identity. A notable example is Oprah Winfrey, whose verification shortly after joining Twitter helped eliminate confusion caused by numerous impersonators, significantly boosting her follower count.
In 2016, Twitter expanded the verification process, allowing any user to apply for the blue tick by submitting a form with personal information. However, the criteria for approval were vague, leading to confusion and frustration among users. Despite the intent behind verification, the blue checkmark evolved into a status symbol, granting its holders exclusive privileges such as advanced notification filtering and priority support.
The Dark Side of Verification
Soon, the verification process became riddled with controversy. Users found it inconsistent; some deserving individuals were denied verification while others were approved without meeting the criteria. This confusion peaked in November 2017 when Jason Kessler, a self-identified white supremacist, received a blue check, leaving many questioning Twitter's bias.
The blue checkmark was exploited by some users to intimidate and harass others, amplifying their voices while silencing dissent. Many felt that the badge undermined free speech, causing individuals to censor their opinions for fear of losing their verified status.
A report from the University of Amsterdam's New Media & Digital Culture division critiqued the verification program, suggesting that Twitter inadvertently favored certain user profiles. The company acknowledged that the blue checkmark had transformed from a mere identity confirmation tool into a symbol of social hierarchy.
The Backlash Against the Blue Check
As the blue checkmark's reputation declined, it became a target for ridicule. The backlash intensified following Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter in October 2022, where he expressed disdain for the existing verification system. His vision included democratizing the platform and providing users with more control.
In November 2022, Musk introduced Twitter Blue, a subscription service offering various features, including the blue checkmark for a monthly fee. He announced that existing verified accounts would lose their badges unless they subscribed by April 20, 2023, igniting outrage among users who felt that verification was essential for trust and safety.
On the deadline, Twitter began stripping the blue checkmarks from non-subscribing accounts, leading to chaos as users experienced fluctuating verification statuses. Reactions varied, with some taking pride in their loss as a stand against the system, while others lamented the damage to their online identities.
The Future of the Blue Checkmark
The future of Twitter's blue checkmark remains uncertain amidst ongoing debates. Some users have embraced Twitter Blue, viewing it as a chance to enhance their experience on the platform. Conversely, many have rejected it due to the negative connotations associated with the blue checkmark, perceiving it as a threat to the platform's authenticity.
As users explore alternative social media platforms, the significance of the blue checkmark has evolved into a complex tapestry of meanings—pride, shame, trust, and exclusion—reflecting the intricate dynamics of social media today.
So, will the blue checkmark endure, or will it fade away? Regardless of its fate, its impact on Twitter and its community is sure to be profound.
Oh, and I do not have, have never had, nor intend to get the blue check. Do you? ☕️
The first video titled "Why Are Twitter's Blue Check Marks Disappearing?" discusses the changing landscape of Twitter’s verification system, highlighting user frustrations and the implications of recent changes.
The second video, "Why Twitter is removing its blue check mark for some accounts," further explores the motivations behind Twitter's decision to strip users of their verification status and the ensuing backlash.